User talk:Toddmeagher

  1. Home
  2. Wiki


Your submission at Articles for creation: You Made Me (Josh Todd album) (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Toddmeagher! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:You made me.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:You made me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: You Made Me (Josh Todd album) (August 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To respond to the email you sent, my declines here are not an assertion that I believe the topic isn't notable. It's an assertion that you have not demonstrated with the sources given that the topic is notable. Most sources only demonstrate that the topic exists, while the interview is not independent and the other sources irrelevant and/or unreliable. A claim of notability looks like: a source that shows it charted nationally in some country, a professional music critic (not blogger) writing a full-length review specifically about this article, detailed coverage in news media that surpasses "this artist will release this album on [date]" etc. There is not that here. Perhaps it exists, and you can find it, and perhaps it doesn't, and you would be better to work on an article that already exists and proves notability. With a backlog of several thousand articles in the queue, and only a handful of volunteers not burned out from reviewing, I'm afraid I can't spend research time giving you a definitive answer as to which it is.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 09:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]