User talk:Time-is-wealth

About the Newly Created Page

Hello time is wealth ... I saw your recently created page, Roopdhyan Meditation. I find that is by AI. Although AI is not completely banned in Wikipedia, there is always a doubt about its reliability. So, always try to write by yourself. If you require AI, always recommend rechecking it and using only Wikipedia-approved formats. Thank You M1rrorCr0ss 08:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi M1rrorCr0ss Thanks a lot for your feedback. Yes, I do understand it. I did draft the piece by myslef by and large and then took AI's help to improve the writing quality, [because: why not :) ]. I have verified and provided relevant citations. Will also keep polishing this piece over the coming days. Again, thanks a lot for your feedback. All the best! Time-is-wealth (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Time-is-wealth, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Knitsey (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Knitsey! Thanks a lot for taking out the time to text.

All the info you provided has been super helpful, and has motivated me to invest more of my time in Wikipedia.

I'll be writing my first article soon, and believe you me, you share some credit for that.

All the best for your future endeavors! Time-is-wealth (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spirit of Cricket (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spirit of Cricket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Time-is-wealth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spirit of Cricket (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some compositional issues need to be addressed (e.g. "Certainly! Here are some of the most notable incidents—both commendable and controversial—that exemplify the "Spirit of Cricket." Each is accompanied by references suitable for citation on Wikipedia or similar platforms.", etc.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spirit of Cricket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Time-is-wealth. Thank you for your work on Kashi Vidvat Parishad. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Needs independent sources that cover this forum/group in depth. But I'm marking it as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]