User talk:Therealpowerflower

  1. Home
  2. Wiki


Welcome!

Hello, Therealpowerflower, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like CMS Watch, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CMS Watch

[edit]

A tag has been placed on CMS Watch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Real Story Group

[edit]
Notice

The article Real Story Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. Tagged for notability issues for years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imcdc Contact 02:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't logged in for a while so I only now see this. Improving notability would be easy, I can do that. Can the page be restored to draft? Therealpowerflower (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real Story Group (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The LLM was only used to generate the refs markup, not to source them, and not for the article text. However I do see the point in "promotional" or "vague" so have rewritten. Therealpowerflower (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Therealpowerflower! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real Story Group (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheObsidianGriffon was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Therealpowerflower! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notability issues?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:16, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Real Story Group has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Real Story Group. Thanks! Joãohola 06:04, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but what do you mean? I followed advice I got in the Teahouse, and rewrote the article to be short and to the point, focussing on references. So it's intended to be finished for now :) Therealpowerflower (talk) 12:39, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Therealpowerflower! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Follow-up to Notability issues?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:22, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]