User talk:TheWorstUsername

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scaledish was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:NOTNOW on this one. Merging is a good idea.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 02:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheWorstUsername! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 02:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Peak (Wyoming) (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:
Possibly notable, but the article needs copyediting. The first section should not be called "Description", please make this into a normal lead. There is editing needed for grammar and punctuation. For example, the last sentence of "Description" is a run-on sentence (please ask me for help if English isn't your first language or for any other reason you need copyediting help). Also the "Terrain/Wildlife" section needs at least one reference to a WP:Reliable source; otherwise the section is totally unreferenced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:28, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]