User talk:Swpb

"African Star Treaty Alliance Group" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect African Star Treaty Alliance Group and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 22#African Star Treaty Alliance Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - IMSoP (talk)

Notice

The article SpaceNews (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivey (talk - contribs) 03:55, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Aaaaa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 25 § Aaaaa until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:43, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jig-a-loo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jig-a-loo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redneck Revolt

[edit]

Ok, there's no source saying it's no longer in existence. But I can find no evidence for it since 2018. Doug Weller talk 14:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of the article uses present tense, as it should unless there is positive evidence that the group has gone inactive. —swpbT • beyond • mutual 17:37, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So it doesn’t matter if what the article says isn’t true. Doug Weller talk 17:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's obviously not what I said. "Was" (without an "as of year") is a positive assertion that the group dissolved, and that needs citation. "Is" is at worst outdated, and we have no evidence of even that. —swpbT • beyond • mutual 20:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t see the difference you see. Doug Weller talk 06:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NPVIC chart/x-axis

[edit]

I was looking at the markup for Template:NPVIC chart/x-axis, and in this snip:

''''{{str rightc|{{#expr: ({{{year-interval}}}*{{{1}}}-{{{year-interval}}})+2006}} |2}}'''

it looks to me like the first four apostrophes should actually be three apostrophes. But you're the author and I don't really understand template-ese. Would you please take a look at this? —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "extra" apostrophe is meant to be there, to appear in abbreviated year labels. E.g., 2015 is abbreviated as '15, the apostrophe indicating the elision of the first two digits. —swpbT • beyond • mutual 15:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]