User talk:Sunnya343
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Welcome!
|
Replaceable non-free use File:Airliners.net logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Airliners.net logo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SGHFan (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Airline Destination lists
[edit]Just a note to say that I am still chipping away at this issue. As of today the number of articles in Category:Lists of airline destinations is 149 and falling. The general sentiment at AFD doesn't seem to have really changed in years, despite the (limited to two specific articles) RFC from earlier this year. We've also now got RSN consensuses against both Routesonline and Aeroroutes/airlineroutes.
If you'd like to start working in this area again, I'd certainly appreciate the help! FOARP (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi FOARP, thank you for reaching out. I decline to participate at this time; I think many of my prior contributions to this area caused a lot of confusion and ill will. Sunnya343 (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- I wouldn't take that ANI report that was lodged against you as a sign that you shouldn't participate in this area. Everyone who contributed in that discussion saw it as not worthy of any action. A bit more caution is the only thing I'd advise. Ultimately, however, participating or not is up to you. FOARP (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)