User talk:Sulaimandaud
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Sulaimandaud has not edited Wikipedia since May 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
April 2021
[edit]
Your edit to Federal Judicial Academy (Pakistan) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 17:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please check the email from irum as soon as you can
[edit]{{You've got mail}} Delicate ve precious (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Invitation to join a discussion that may be of your special interest as a Muslim
[edit]Hello, I'm working on a broader assessment of image usage across Wikipedia to ensure we're aligned with community guidelines, especially around minimal use and avoiding undue weight. There's an image in the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy article—depicting a squealing pig—that raises potential concerns under WP:IMAGEUSE and WP:UNDUE. It might contribute more to visual emphasis than to educational context. Since our policies discourage unnecessary or potentially inflammatory visuals unless well-supported (see WP:NOTDECORATION and WP:NOT#REPOSITORY), I plan to bring this image up at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. My concern is strictly policy-based; I’m not personally offended. I also recognize that such images might carry unintended implications for a wide range of readers including you. If this is a topic you care about, I’d really value your perspective once the discussion opens, I'll be using intellectual and convincing arguments to get the image removed. Looking forward to engaging respectfully. Delicate ve precious (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)