User talk:SpiritEdit

Welcome!

Hello, SpiritEdit, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bitlife, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 06:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bitlife

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bitlife, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitLife. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 06:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Http iosue. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chunkz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Http iosue (talk) 02:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do I have to make the edit again, then include the citation? Or is there some way to unarchive it and just add the reference? SpiritEdit (talk) 11:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you can edit it back with the citation as long it's from a reliable source and does not violate their privacy(doxxing etc) Http iosue (talk) 12:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks. SpiritEdit (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fandom.com is not a reliable source, its a fan site with no editorial whatsoever. Please look into this list "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources" to learn what is considered reliable source or not in wikipedia. Http iosue (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. SpiritEdit (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello SpiritEdit! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Explanatory footnote help!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Please review WP:OVERLINKING - FlightTime (open channel) 14:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sorry using disruptive formatting. But where did I break that rule? In my sandbox? If so, please tell me where I made the mistake or mistakes, and I will be happy to correct them. SpiritEdit (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up on what I did to have this warning? SpiritEdit (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]