User talk:Shaneapickle

Welcome to my talk page! Talk to me about any issues you have with my editing, or ask about my work here!

October 2023

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Minecraft (franchise) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Minecraft (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the source is mostly youtube and research from the internet. Shaneapickle (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All material must be attributable to reliable, published sources per WP:V Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shaneapickle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gorilla Tag have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. R0paire 17:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the game, it is actually called Monke, not Monkey, thats why i edited it. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Outer Worlds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for IM-2

On 11 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article IM-2, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was one of the first ones to figure out that NASA and IM lost contact, yet some people didnt believe me. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hello, I am working on a page about a recent plane crash that happened yesterday (March 9th), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Selam (moon) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Selam (moon). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selam (moon) has been accepted

Selam (moon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hey, I made a new page about a asteroid moon, Selam and I need some help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johann Nepomuk Hauser has been accepted

Johann Nepomuk Hauser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aprod

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Aprod, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Jean-Rémi Yama

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Jean-Rémi Yama, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bored kittycat (talk) 14:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok Shaneapickle (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war claim

You are going around making accusations about an edit war, but which specific article(s) is this supposed edit war happening on? Fram (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me explain here, MHD and Kajmer are warring over kurdish nationalist pages, (the battle ones to be specific) in which MHD is claiming that kajmer is targetting kurdish nationalist pages, but kajmer is saying he didnt. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specific articles. If you can't name them, then no report at any admin noticeboard will even be looked at. Disagreeing about a topic or occasionally editing the same page is not an edit war. Fram (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]