User talk:Seyamar

August 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Chariotrider555 (talk) 21:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you Put Miss information

You Putting wrong information for shiv sharveswara Avatar Currect this Sanjibrajbanshi2 (talk) 04:42, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanjibrajbanshi2 Okay, before complaining, learn about academic tone and basic sentence structure, especially in context of when to use capital letters. You can't just put poorly structured content in the article. Additionally, what misinformation are you talking about, because whatever you added was already present in the article. Seyamar^💬📜 06:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Some Information is Fasle This Not Available Our Ved and Puranas I Am Dharm Acharya I Know What True And What False Please Learn Puranas And Vedas Than Put Information Otherwise Don't Change My Right Information Sanjibrajbanshi2 (talk) 06:45, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First, I don't care who you are—read WP:MOS to know how an article needs to be written.

Secondly, what you did was:

You added Bangla script—as per consensus, only Sanskrit is retained for WP:Hinduism articles
You added "Sharabheshwara" and "A Powerfull Avater of Lord Shiva this Avatar"; pathetically formatted, also repetitive information, read the next para of the article

Seyamar^💬📜 09:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page numbers for Bhagavad Gita: An Exegetical Commentary

Last month you added references to Bhagavad Gita: An Exegetical Commentary to several articles. I've noticed that the reference is to pages l–li (lower case letter "L" twice, and a lower case "I"). I suspect it should be either pages 1-11 (one through eleven) or it's the first two pages of an introduction, i-ii (lower case Roman numerals one through two). I'm not able to access the text. Do you recall what that pagination should be? I'd be happy to make the fixes. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:26, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Madri

On 13 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Madri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some scholars dispute the Mahabharata's account of Madri (pictured) self-immolating on her husband's pyre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Madri. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Madri), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reverting the info infobox image of article rukmini

The image you reverted into is a nonspecific depicted sculpture of Devi rukmini the image added earlier is specific depiction of Rukmini from 12 century old Vitthal temple reverting it citing regional is not logical since it is most revered temple of rukmini .. 2409:40F4:211F:FEF7:7CD8:C5D6:3537:C253 (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]