User talk:Sadiowiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sadiowiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ToadetteEdit, thank you for reviewing my draft on Jeff Campbell (Apostle). I appreciate your time and feedback. I understand the article was declined due to concerns about notability and the lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.
I've included sources like La Voz, The Denver Post, Longmont Daily Times-Call, HuffPost, Westword, and references from the Bonfils-Stanton Foundation and Denver Arts & Venues recognizing his recent awards. Some are in-depth features and some are coverage of major public events.
Could you clarify which types of references I should emphasize or add to better demonstrate notability? Are any of the ones I included sufficient if formatted properly with inline <ref> tags?
Any additional advice on strengthening the draft for resubmission would be greatly appreciated. I have also submitted my inquiry to the teahouse as well.
Thanks again!
—Sadiowiki Sadiowiki (talk) 07:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]