User talk:ResearchHaven

Welcome!

Hello, ResearchHaven, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:BJAK, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 08:20, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BJAK

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:BJAK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 08:20, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello ResearchHaven. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ResearchHaven. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ResearchHaven|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi , I'm a new volunteer and this is a home-grown company that I want to create to add on my contribution. please correct me if my writing is wrong and how can i publish this page. ResearchHaven (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with this business? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any relationship with this business. ResearchHaven (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on. All your edits, not just here, but also on the Malay Wikipedia and on Commons, have to do only with this business. I'm assuming there's a reason for that? You've even uploaded the company's logos as your own work – how could that be, if you're not connected to them somehow? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused. I started to edit their Malay page and realised they dont have English page. So I try to create an English page. The logo is from Google Image. I thought adding that would strengthen my article? What should I do now? ResearchHaven (talk) 08:59, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you did not personally create the logo and do not hold its copyright as you are currently claiming, you must immediately without delay request deletion of the logo from Commons. Logos are not typically uploaded to Commons, as uploading to Commons makes the image available for anyone to use for any purpose with attribution- something that is usually unwise for a company logo. Logos are typically uploaded to this Wikipedia locally under "fair use" rules, which does not allow for use in drafts. This case is a little different in that the logo is simple text that probably cannot be copyrighted, but you still cannot claim that it is your personal work unless you indeed created it.

Images are not relevant to the draft process, which only considers the text and sources. Images can wait until the draft is accepted into the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not associated with this company, how did you come to edit about it? You didn't select this company at random. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]