User talk:RealCaucasian

June 2025

Oh, I'm sorry; I just didn't understand what you were doing.--PawPatroler (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to the Shashka page

You obviously think that an encyclopedia is a forum for point of view pushing. It is not. It is a compendium of knowledge and it HAS to be neutral in tone. You are pushing an agenda, that is anti-Russian and anti-Cossack. I presume that you are some sort of nationalist from one of the Caucasian nations or peoples. This is confirmed by your assumption that I am a Cossack, which I am not I am British (of English, Irish and Welsh ancestry), because I have been pushing back, entirely legitimately, against your agenda. As an example, the bayonet is named after the French town of Bayonne, but an encyclopedic treatment that claimed it as a 'French weapon' would be inadmissible because it has been used for centuries all over the world. Likewise, though the shaska originated in the Caucasus, it saw its greatest use amongst the Cossack groups and subsequently was manufactured on a very large scale, for over a century, by Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union. It is not an exclusively Caucasian weapon. Wikipedia has methods to curtail POV pushers who disrupt. Urselius (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

before answer you I look at your edits (1,2,3,4,5,6) and found that you have obsession in shashka.

I know what encyclopedia is.

this is you that use "POV pushing" not me, want forcibly associate shashka to cossacks (just look at Ukrainian cossacks) and use: "There are more things that are important than merely the origin of something. Like who manufactured the greatest number and who used the most and perception" OR "A weapon is not merely defined by its origin, usage is important". Let me give you an example type56 rifle is most produce AK variant but it doesn't make AK Chinese, AK is Russian rifle that many countries make. again even I'm not against Russian and cossack adoption of Shashka I just wrote that "it's already written twice that " Later, most of the Russian and Ukrainian Cossacks adopted the weapon" and "Russian troops, having encountered it during their conquest of the Caucasus (1817–1864), preferred it to their issued sabres." No need for replay three times"

At first think that you're Cossack (until see this edit)And yes I'm proudly Caucasian and Unlike some people who call themselves "I am British (of English, Irish and Welsh ancestry)" and in other time "I have Malayali ancestry, from Kerala, in southern India, of which I am proud". It's very bad for person to sold his blood for a article in wiki (please don't write again that your (mix of British (of English, Irish and Welsh ancestry) and Malayali ancestry, from Kerala, in southern India, of which I am proud) it's make it worse).

I'm not pushing anything against Cossack I just wrote truth and yes me and nearly all Caucasian don't like cossacks and one of the reason is that what you doing, these Wannabe Caucasian (if you're by any chance (not from Britain or India and) from post Soviet countries khow what I mean) want to claim our culture, even now claim they live in Caucasus (in Circassia) before Russian invasion.

Me and you can't reach a conclusion and I think we need Third opinion. RealCaucasian (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Hercule Poirot? Rooting around in deleted conversations, deleted because they were unedifying. I do have an obsession, and it is not with the shashka. As you can see I have created and wholly rewritten many articles on Wikipedia, on a wide variety of subjects. Despite writing much concerning The Byzantine Empire, I am not Greek. People can write about subjects that they just find interesting, they do not have to have a direct connection. I am, however, obsessed with pushing back at any POV peddler who crosses my path. People whose viewpoint is dominated by nationalistic, cultural or religious bias. They want to impose their bias on Wikipedia articles and I try my best to stop them and maintain the necessary neutral tone of an encyclopedia. I am confident that Wikipedia process will find me correct and you biased.

I do not lie or distort, if I say something, then it is true. Urselius (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

answer on your talk page my friend. RealCaucasian (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]