User talk:Quetstar

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

Talk:Syria discussion

Please respond regarding your edits at Talk:Syria. Thank you. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedoxm I have responded. Thanks. Quetstar (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no problem. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my revert of Ba'athis Syria I wrote the wrong text

I wanted to write "Use the talk page. By amazing coincidence, no one complained about the photos before you came here with your subjective opinion." Algirr (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did so because 1: there were way too many images, 2: their quality was poor and 3: they made the sections look awful to read. Quetstar (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. No one complained about their size except you, and you didn't even bother to create a consensus.

2. The quality of the photographs corresponded to the historical periods in which they were taken.

3. Again, this is just your subjective opinion and no one had a request to do this. Algirr (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Bashar al-Assad § Infobox image

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bashar al-Assad § Infobox image. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 19:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for Ba'athist Syria

An article that been involved with (Ba'athist Syria) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Assad regimeAssad regime). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 01:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Japan's head of state

Or not, as the case may be. Thanks for reverting the removal of the phrase, and its accompanying references. What does "not explicit" mean? Presumably there may be countries with written constitutions in which the phrase "Head of state" occurs, or possibly an obvious direct translation, "Capo di stato" or something perhaps. But the Japanese constitution is unsurprisingly written in Japanese, and it would be astonishing if the English phrase "Head of state" appeared, or even a katakana transcription, ヘッド・オブ・ステート. There might be an obvious direct translation, 国主 or something, but there might not. It seems to me that since the role of the Emperor is clearly described as being the role of a head of state, the arguments are mostly silly. The constitution is a declaration of how things are intended to be, not a form-filling exercise to tell Wikipedia what to put at the top of its article. Well, I don't know; the remover said "see my reasons", but I couldn't see any pointer to them. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]