User talk:Questionadora ávida

About last editions...

Look, what you're doing with the article doesn't make sense because it talks about the Swaziland's delegation on that date. What you're adding is untimely. It's as if we were talking about the participation of the delegations from Thailand and Ethiopia without a timeline when they were once called Siam and Abyssinia. What I see is that you're going to want to make a cross-examination of (now country X) in all the articles, and that breaks the timeline. Please don't pull off untimely stunts. You know that's the kind of edits that got you kicked off the Portuguese Wikipedia. Please use common sense and don't insist. Taichi (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reversion is still unjustified, look at the article about Dahomey at the 1972 Summer Games, the article literally starts with "Dahomey (now Benin). The edits on the Swaziland page were just following the pattern of this article, but of course it's much easier and more convenient for you to judge me by the edits on the Portuguese Wikipedia (which you probably only went to for a cursory analysis, since you never mentioned exactly what kind of edits I made there outside the blocking outlines). And please stop harassing me and leave my edits alone, no one is complaining but you (apart from one wrong edit I made on the page about trans rights in the UK, but other than that no one else complained). Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you can't call it "harassment" if you did something wrong on another project. There's a saying that "birds can't shoot guns" so I'd appreciate it if you know your place. If you make a controversial edit, it's my duty to point it out to you. I don't intend to be silent or censored by your warnings. That applies to any project. I won't be held responsible if another user points out more errors. That's the last thing I'll warn you about, so you don't get ideas later about reversing the scenarios and favoring you with phantoms of "harassment". Taichi (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand one thing: it doesn't matter what I did on the Portuguese Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, what matters is what I did here on the English Wikipedia. I appreciate you pointing out my edits, but I will not accept being treated as if I were a mere article vandal. If you and the other users had treated me like a decent human being instead of just punishing me, there would be no problems and I would have fixed my edits without any problems. Pay attention to what I'm about to say: There are ways to point out someone's mistakes without making them feel horrible about themselves. A user on the Spanish Wikipedia did exactly that to me, and I thanked him for treating me more understandingly. Questionadora ávida (talk) 17:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, it is extremely hypocritical of you to come and talk to me about "common sense", when the English Wikipedia clearly uses "ESWATINI" and not "Swaziland" (with exceptions such as on the pages about the Olympic Games, since the country competed in them for many years as "Swaziland"). I will make the same argument that you used on the Spanish Wikipedia, do not change Wikipedia to favor your arguments. Questionadora ávida (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see these kinds of answers got you kicked off in the other project. Be happy and celebrate here then. Surely someone from here will point you out in the future. Let's see if the "avid questioner" attitude works here and they believe you. I won't bother you anymore here. Taichi (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you an e-mail

Hello, Questionadora ávida. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi Questionadora ávida! I have sent you an e-mail with a request I made there. Can you complete it please? Thanks, Pawel PDoro (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Questionadora ávida (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Questionadora ávida Ok. Thank you so much... PDoro (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Questionadora ávida You still didn't started and completed the article. Can you make the request now? Thanks PDoro (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article in Nahuatl is actually already ready. Questionadora ávida (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks PDoro (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Edits

The reason I originally wanted to comment on this is that you simply added an excess citations tag to the article LGBTQ rights in New York, where I have no addressed that issue. I would request in future you first try to rectify the issue (in this case that means boldly removing some sources and explaining why) before simply tagging an issue, although I assume you did this in good faith.

Secondarily, having looked at your edit history, I would like to remind you that any addition of content to an article or any change to an article text that affects its meaning should not be marked as a minor edit.

Hope you continue to edit wikipedia and thank you for your contributions, Emily.Owl ( she/her • talk) 13:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Fraysexuality (main article)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fraysexuality (main article) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 30 § Fraysexuality (main article) until a consensus is reached. GZWDer (talk) 19:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressed edits

Hi, Questionadora ávida, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! PhilKnight (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noetisexuality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noetisexuality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noetisexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

꧁Zanahary꧂ 21:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little embarrassed about it. I didn't expect the article to be this bad. The Portuguese version had few sources, and I wanted to add to them, but I didn't do a very good job. If I'm not even good enough to translate an article, imagine creating one on my own?... Questionadora ávida (talk) 22:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. The Portuguese article actually has the same problems—I don't know if Portuguese Wikipedia's reliable sourcing policy is different from the English Wikipedia's, but its sources are all either terrible or don't mention notiesexuality. If you just want the article deleted, you can say so at the deletion discussion and it'll be deleted quickly. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just have one more thing to tell you: the Portuguese Wikipedia is completely crazy. Nothing about it makes sense. Sometimes administrators change article titles without the consent of other editors, and nothing happens. They say they only accept common names (in the case of articles about countries/territories), but there are articles there with extremely unusual names that few people use. I think I should analyze the articles there several times before starting a translation. Questionadora ávida (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can also try writing a new article here on your own! Check out WP:YFA for basic guidance ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in LGBTQ rights in Rio de Janeiro (state), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 23:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything wrong, most other articles about LGBTQ rights follow the same editing pattern as I did, such as LGBTQ Rights in Hawaii, LGBTQ Rights in Portugal, LGBTQ Rights in the United Kingdom, LGBTQ rights in Brazil, LGBTQ rights in the Republic of Ireland, LGBTQ rights in Northern Ireland, etc. In reality, the real deviation was how the article was before and how you insisted on leaving it. Questionadora ávida (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For this specific edit, please refer WP:OLINK. We cannot have links to commonly known subjects. Jalen Barks (Woof) 01:29, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but then all the pages I cited and others should be changed, not just a specific, random page where I edited. Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, there was no need to remove "queer" from the text, since the article's title is "LGBTQ rights in Rio de Janeiro (state)". Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apothisexuality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apothisexuality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apothisexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Astaire (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBTQ rights in Rondônia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro I. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauri Miranda Silva

The article Lauri Miranda Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0xReflektor (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauri Miranda Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauri Miranda Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauri Miranda Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

0xReflektor (talk) 09:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]