User talk:Publ 23

Mr. Paradox Paradise draft

Hello, nice work on the Paradox draft!

I expanded the infobox and added some wiki projects on the talk page too. Wikociewie (talk) 21:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

💪💪💪 Publ 23 (talk) 05:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think a Wikipage for Spiritual Letters – The Art of Mr. Paradox Paradise would be great as well to understand the artistic movement in Berlin. Publ 23 (talk) 12:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help?Draft:Spiritual Letters

and with the Paradox Draft? Publ 23 (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiritual Letters (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spiritual Letters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Review. I will edit it. Publ 23 (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Publ 23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]