User talk:Prempy

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Prempy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Okuapeman School does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Tacyarg (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Daminozide. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Prempy! Your additions to University of Health and Allied Sciences have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CoconutOctopus talk 16:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Prempy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 16:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Okuapeman School have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 08:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm NebY. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Sex manual. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NebY (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keir Starmer

[edit]

This article uses British English, I have reverted your changes to spellings. Orange sticker (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to still be changing the article to American English. What's worse is that you've also changed it in direct quotes, which you shouldn't do. Please leave the article's language as it is, thank you. — Czello (music) 11:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on my contributions

[edit]

Hello everyone! 👋

I’m fairly new to editing Wikipedia and I would love to get feedback on my recent contributions. Are there any areas you think I could improve on or guidelines I should pay closer attention to?

Thanks in advance for your help and guidance!

Prempy (talk) 12:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Role of Social Media in the Modern Reparations Movement moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to The Role of Social Media in the Modern Reparations Movement. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it seems to consist of AI-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ProtobowlAddict talk! 17:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Protobowladdict
Hello, thanks for the review but I would like to ask why and how u are saying the article consist of Ai text Prempy (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
idk this is more like an essay and doesn't need its own article ProtobowlAddict talk! 17:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Protobowladdict
I have u seen the legit reference from wiki library I used, why do u think is more like an essay than an article, so are u saying the topic doesn't need an article.
this article is one of the article list from the African Wiki Challenge. u can browse thru there Prempy (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what african wiki challenge send link ProtobowlAddict talk! 18:12, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be the result of some editathon. I'll try to contact the organizers. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you editing this article in such a peculiar manner? One line at a time, breaking off mid sentence, then continuing on the next edit? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Escape Orbit is something wrong with that?? Prempy (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It constantly leaves the article, which is not a draft, in a fragmented state. It also makes it difficult for others to understand what you are doing. Is there a reason you are editing it like this? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Escape Orbit ok I'll stop that Prempy (talk) 15:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Prempy You are intentionally trying to game your edit count for the editathon. Please stop immediately. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 05:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen I want to know if the is a particular way words are added to a developing article Prempy (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I need to talk to the organizers of this event. Do you know who I can contact and how? Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 08:55, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen it's a global thing so I don't know Prempy (talk) 08:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How did you join the event? Do you attend their Zoom calls? Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 09:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Role of social media in the modern reparations movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 06:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Role of social media in the modern reparations movement for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Role of social media in the modern reparations movement, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Role of social media in the modern reparations movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Crab44 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crab44. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Mz7 (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Prempy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been to a sockpuppet Mz7 has suspected, I assure you that it is not so, we are a group of people in an editathon when we are connected to the same wifi connection in a university institution, and I think that was why it was suspected that one person is using multiple accounts because we all use the same IP address, I plead and beseech thee that it is a misunderstanding and that the necessary actions to take place thank you. Please unblock me so I can contribute productively. Prempy (talk) 11:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

After further review and consideration, I have decided to reverse this block. At the time I blocked your account, I did not realize that you were a participant in the edit-a-thon meta:Event:Africa Wiki Challenge 2025/Home. Originally, I blocked this account to prevent sockpuppetry, which refers to the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts by a single person to disrupt Wikipedia. However, it appears instead that your account was part of a group of multiple people who were editing as part of the edit-a-thon event. I sincerely apologize for my mistake.

Among the accounts that I had blocked as part of this sockpuppet investigation, I noticed that many of the accounts exhibited the following behaviors. I would like to warn you that the following behaviors may be considered disruptive by the Wikipedia community. (You may not have engaged in some of these behaviors, but some of your fellow edit-a-thon participants did do so, so I wanted to make you aware of them.)

  • Using LLMs to post AI-generated content to Wikipedia without careful human review. We have an essay discussing LLMs here: Wikipedia:Large language models. If you do choose to use AI to assist you in editing Wikipedia, you must be careful to understand the limitations of these tools and carefully review the AI-generated content before publishing it on Wikipedia. You should consider disclosing whether content is AI-generated in the edit summaries of your edits.
  • Changing national varieties of English. The English-language Wikipedia has a diverse community of English-speaking contributors who may have differences in the way that they spell certain words or use grammar. To make things consistent, we have rules for determining which national variety of English to use which can be read here: Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. When in doubt, I would avoid switching national varieties of English (e.g. travelled vs. traveled or color vs. colour) without first discussing the issue on a talk page.
  • Changing date formats. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Dates, months, and years for our guidelines on date formats. Please avoid using ordinals like 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. in dates on Wikipedia. For example, instead of 30th July 2025, use 30 July 2025.
  • Making many edits that could be accomplished by one. When submitting edits to Wikipedia, I recommend only pressing the "save edits" button once the changes are fully ready to be public. I noticed that some of the accounts involved in this case would sometimes submit edits while they were still in the middle of writing sentences or adding citations. This may be disruptive because readers might see the half-written sentences before you fix them, and it may also give the impression that you are trying to artificially inflate your edit count, which is used to grant you permission to edit certain articles.

I hope that this advice is helpful to you. I apologize once again for this block, and I hope that despite this negative experience, you will still consider joining the Wikipedia community and becoming a Wikipedia editor. Mz7 (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in chronological order. The blocking checkuser was aware that this could be an editathon, but there still seems to be sockpuppetry or meat puppetry going on. 331dot (talk) 11:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review my unblock request. I understand that the checkuser was aware this could be an editathon but still saw signs of sockpuppetry or coordinated editing.
I want to respectfully clarify that I was part of the official "Africa Wiki Challenge 2025 in Ho" editathon, held at a university setting, where multiple editors participated and were all connected through the same institutional Wi-Fi. The event is publicly documented here: https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Africa_Wiki_Challenge_2025_in_Ho
Each participant, including myself, used their individual accounts and contributed independently. I personally have no control over how others behaved, but I acted in good faith and only aimed to contribute positively to Wikipedia.
If any of our actions unintentionally raised red flags, I sincerely apologize. I am happy to cooperate, learn from the experience, and follow all community guidelines moving forward. I hope this clarifies my intentions, and I kindly ask for a reconsideration. Thank you. Prempy (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please place new posts at the bottom. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only a checkuser can remove this block. 331dot (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot okk Prempy (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Dumelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot So how will I go about it if I meet a disambiguation page. Prempy (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]