User talk:Paololapi

July 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Paololapi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Paololapi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Paololapi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot, i really appreciate all the feedback! I'll work on a new article, do you have any more feedback you can give me? Im part of the team at Jeeves, i just want to have an updated article of the company, just factuals, nothing fancy, like Brex or other fintechs have, how can i achieve this?
Thanks again Paololapi (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm 331dot. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Jeeves

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jeeves (company). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Bobby, i appreciate the feedback. Already submitted a new version, could you let me know? Thanks! Paololapi (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Bobby Cohni already uploaded! could you help me review? thank you Paololapi (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your revision here removed the necessary templates and AFC history required for you resubmit. I've restored it for you, to request another review, go to the draft article Draft:Jeeves (company) and click the blue "Resbumit" button. Thanks, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your user page was also inappropriate as a description of your employer and a draft article. I've removed it for you and left only your declaration; and an automatic notice was left above in the #July 2025 section. As it says in the notice, you are to leave your COI/PAID declarations there and you may describe yourself, but please keep edits regarding Jeeves to the draft location, thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much Bobby, you've been of amazing help! Already submitted 2A01:E11:2430:3A40:584B:B9BE:9823:4412 (talk) 19:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
hi @Bobby Cohn! wanted to follow up on my request, any good news? thank you! Paololapi (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it is still in the queue. Another editor should take a look shortly, but they are reviewed in random order so please be patient. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much 2A01:E11:2430:3A40:81D8:3B85:E7DC:C359 (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]