User talk:Packerfansam

Nomination of Ed Rate for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Rate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Rate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiProjects

[edit]

Hi, thank you for all the work you do on Wikipedia. I wanted to flag that when adding WikiProjects to talk pages, please don't add a section heading (it confuses things like WP:RATER, and there is no need to sign it. Thank you. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please also ensure that sections on education in biography articles are suitably referrences, especially WP:BLP articles. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Howie Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm failing to find any in-depth coverage in reliable sources needed for WP:SPORTCRIT. Nothing outside of brief mentions in newspapers (in coverage of games they played in), and appetences in sports listings/databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 19:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark E. Anderson for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark E. Anderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark E. Anderson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]