User talk:Nttgip1
November 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm IsCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dhërmi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. IsCat (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Himariote dialect. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IsCat (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello editors,
- I’d like to raise a concern about the current phrasing that describes Dhërmi’s inhabitants as “ethnic Greeks.”
- According to INSTAT (2011 Census) and several Albanian academic works (Pëllumb Xhufi, Historia e Shqiptarëve, 2020; Ardit Bido, The Myth of Northern Epirus and the Orthodox Albanians of Himara, Studime Historike, 2018), the population of Dhërmi is ethnically Albanian and part of the Orthodox Christian community.
- Some older residents speak Greek due to Ottoman-era church influence, when Greek was used as the liturgical and educational language for Orthodox believers. This is consistent with the Ottoman millet system, which categorized people by faith rather than ethnicity (Braude, Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire, 1982).
- Therefore, I suggest updating the article wording to reflect that the community is Albanian Orthodox, while the presence of Greek speakers reflects historical religious influence rather than Greek ethnic origin.
- I’m happy to collaborate on phrasing that stays neutral and well-sourced. ~2025-32377-39 (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhërmi. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 19:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Demetrios1993. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Your editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please stop editing the page and discuss on the talk page to create a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a Third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you break the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if it looks like you intend to continue reverting. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Your goal is to promote propaganda and false information through wikapedia and hardly lacks any evidence or any sources which lacked any proof or existence of a “minority” Nttgip1 (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nttgip1 reported by User:Demetrios1993 (Result: ). Thank you. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 09:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.