User talk:NoahBWill2002

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm LaffyTaffer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Babylon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LaffyTaffer (talk) 16:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laffy, look, I typed down my recent contributions about Babylon, so that you could understand the truth about its legacy as a corruptive symbolic culture. And as a Christian, I should tell you to turn away from your sins, and turn to God, right now; because if not, continuing to serve allegiance to Babylon the Great will only lure you to your own self-destruction. I'm just trying to help you, my friend. NoahBWill2002 (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adding your personal commentary to articles is not acceptable under Wikipedia policy for a number of reasons, WP:OR and WP:NPOV among others, this is not the place for you to convert people to your faith. The inclusion of your fanart is also not acceptable and has been addressed below by editors more experienced in image use policy. LaffyTaffer (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:NPOV, which is one of the core rules of Wikipedia. You are welcome to hold your own opinions. But you are not allowed insert those opinions into Wikipedia articles. If you continue to do so, you are likely to find yourself blocked from editing. Opolito (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On a less serious note, I request/suggest that you stop prefacing your edit summaries with Just added an image/Just put in xyz content/Just made xyz change/etc. Those sorts of edit summaries are commonly used by vandals who are lying about the changes they make("Just changed spelling" but actually deleted half the page, etc), meaning janitors like me may assume you're making a malicious edit before it's examined. Keeping things short and sweet is usually a better way to go with edit summaries. This isn't a warning at all, just a pet peeve of mine. Thanks :) LaffyTaffer (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The King of Kings (2025 film), you may be blocked from editing. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fanart

[edit]

Please stop adding your own fanart to articles such as Batsuit. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not deviantart or fandom. Thanks, Opolito (talk) 16:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to this, I can see from your reply on User talk:SleepDeprivedGinger that you aren't likely to have a positive response here, but Wikipedia has the policies it does for a reason. An encyclopedia is simply not the place to try to publish your own artwork. There are many, many, many, many other websites where you can do this freely. Deviantart mentioned above is good; Reddit might be another. There's loads. The fact that we do not allow this type of content does not mean you are being persecuted (that's not what that word means at all actually) or that we are your enemies. We are just preserving this space for its intended use. Hopefully you can understand. -- Fyrael (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Considering they were apparently banned from Fandom, I'm puzzled why they thought that the same behaviour would be acceptable on Wikipedia, which has far stricter standards than other wikis. If it wasn't for these messages, I'd be tempted to raise my above warning to level 3 considering the disruptive editing thus far. LaffyTaffer (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noah, please see the message we left you on your talk page at Wikimedia Commons about these pictures as well. Bastique ☎ call me! 17:46, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents alert

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NoahBWill2002,
If you continue to add your own artwork to articles on Wikipedia, you will be blocked. You have already been blocked on the Commons, you could easily be blocked here for trying to promote yourself and your art which could be seen as disruptive editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My unblock requisition

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoahBWill2002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Truly, I'm just truly sorry for posting my own stuff, without permission from others, in December of last year and sock-puppet-ing you guys, off-profile; and I do mean it, this time; honest! Now, look, if I accept your criticism about me, my positive creativity, and my religion of Christianity, will you guys ever forgive me, please? - NoahB2002 01:13, 9 March 2025 A.D. (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure why you're bringing up your religion; your religion does not affect this matter. You don't describe the constructive edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Continued block evasion

[edit]

@Cullen328: as the blocking admin. This user is now evading their block at 173.185.17.184 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), see [1] Opolito (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Opolito, I blocked the IP for two weeks. Thanks. Cullen328 (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cullen328: and again at 173.185.18.245 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). I've filed a sockpuppet report as well [2]. Opolito (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Opolito, I blocked that IP for two weeks also. Thanks. Cullen328 (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]