User talk:Neotaruntius

Welcome!

Hi Neotaruntius! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 10:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Narhari Vishnu Gadgil moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Narhari Vishnu Gadgil. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Narhari Vishnu Gadgil

Hello, Neotaruntius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Narhari Vishnu Gadgil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Narhari Vishnu Gadgil

Hello, Neotaruntius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Narhari Vishnu Gadgil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phandebaaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaalbaaz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought, the link to Disambiguation page was proper, because I needed to include all 3 films mentioned there., namely

   Chaalbaaz (1958 film), a 1958 Bollywood film directed by Nanabhai Bhatt, starring Nirupa Roy and Jairaj

   ChaalBaaz, a 1989 Bollywood film directed by Pankaj Parashar

   Chalbaaz, a 2018 Indian Bengali-language film starring Shakib Khan.

The sentence with the link, that takes the reader to this disambiguation page reads, " Interestingly, there are at least three movies with the latter name also"

Obviously, I can only refer to three movies by referring to the disambiguation page. Still, I do not want to go against any guidelines. So do suggest, what should I do. Many thanks.Neotaruntius (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coracoid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarcoid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: Thanks for pointing out this ambiguity. I will address it immediately. Thanks again. Neotaruntius (talk) 03:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Neotaruntius! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Query from a Newbie, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:23, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Citation error cleanup Sir

Hello, I have seen your urge about citation error cleanup. If you are feeling free then you can clean up various citation related errors. Editors left such error on citation templates unintentionally, many don't know that exist or not. But you are looking for solution, You are welcome SIR 🫡––KEmel49(📝,📋) 18:54, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KEmel49 Thanks. I would love to do that . Let me visit this page, and then I will ask for advice from you. Thanks again. Neotaruntius (talk) 10:57, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KEmel49 Thanks. I visited the page that you told. Actually did a bit more of navigation through that page [further page links given at the end] and ultimately reached this page - Fletcher (singer) [This was listed as a page which need "cleanup"]. Then I attempted correcting something, I had never done before - Instagram citation. I learnt by hit and trial and by my very good friend. Citation 22 was showing an Instagram error, and I corrected it. I think I did it well, but may I request you to please visit and check everything. thanks. Neotaruntius (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Neotaruntius: You did it, there are no more citation related error or maintainance text in this article, go on. Happy editing.––KEmel49(📝,📋) 15:00, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KEmel49. Thanks. The edit at Poppy Liu was trickier, as the main idea was to guess the date [of ref 15]. The post referred to at ref 15 has been deleted [or made private; not sure; is there a way to know that?]. It was not in the Ghost Archive also. So I guessed the year from context; left the edit summary very brief and concise, and instead added the detailed summary in the talk page. Is this the right thing to do? Kindly advise. Thanks for encouragement. Neotaruntius (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]