User talk:NelsonLee20042020

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 shootings of Tremonton police officers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 shootings of Tremonton police officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2025 Austin Target shooting for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Austin Target shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Austin Target shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 01:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of articles and alternative Singaporean sources

[edit]

Hi there, I’d like to say that you've done amazing work on your true crime articles in Singapore, the region and around the world. I just wanted to point out that it would be best to tone down the sympathetic tone and humanisation of criminals as these come across as unencyclopaedic and closer to editorials. It's best to just write their biography in a plain and neutral tone such as their occupation, background or actions, without adding personal character descriptions.

I would also suggest avoiding alternative news sources as much as possible such as Mothership, MustShareNews or The Independent Singapore, among others, as these are generally considered unreliable, questionable and often engage in churnalism. I am not criticising your work at all and in fact I really enjoyed reading the articles you created, but if these entries gain more attention from other editors or are considered as potential good articles in the future, these issues are likely to be raised. Aleain (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aleain, thank you for the acknowledgement. I will try my best to improve further on these issues. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 08:36, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]