User talk:NEDOCHAN

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Adolescence

Hi fellow Adolescence admirer, I have been following the page and giving inputs to the article as well. I like this series a lot. I have some more suggessions to make as well. Can i point put to you about the changes made by Hildreth gazzard, which you later reverted back? I think that guy made some ood changes. Shall we refine it and use some of it and write entirely new to make the article better? Cheers. Harshana.nadeeshan (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The additions, in my opinion, contained a lot of errors and the tone was not encyclopaedic. As a consequence, in my opinion, they made the article worse.

I suggest going to the talk page of the article. NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're insane. A lunatic. Go to hell Harshana.nadeeshan (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I've failed to be WP:CIVIL, so I'd appreciate the same from you.

I was trying to be polite. NEDOCHAN (talk) 20:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

Homer’s Enemy was fine until You changed it. Stop it. 50.204.27.36 (talk) 15:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prolific sock puppet permanently banned trolls obsessed with irritating edits on kids' TV shows are not people from whom I take advice NEDOCHAN (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Homer’s Enemy

Stop messing it up. Bart's subplot goes AT THE BOTTOM. Homer wasn't trying to impress Grimes by acting as a model employee, he was trying to earn his respect. Also, it already says "Springfield Nuclear Power Plant" so the abbreviation of "SNPP" is UNECESSARY. Finally, "S'S" isn't mandatory.

You are a sockpuppet who's made the same edit under about 20 accounts. Stop editing. I will report you if I have to but there are better uses of my time. Reverting is quick. I will continue to do so and, if you don't like it, I suggest going to ANI, where I will inform them of the fact that you're a long term abuser.NEDOCHAN (talk) 22:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Fugitive (Season 1)

In your edit, the "no. in season" for the two part ""Never Wave Goodbye" has the numbers as "4 & N/A" instead of "4 & 5". Even if some sockpuppet edited it, their not wrong about it. 4.16.93.150 (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Clockwork Orange's influence on haute couture

Hi, I saw that you recently undid my edit on the article for A Clockwork Orange. I have also seen your note that the content does not seem notable, and I wanted to discuss that -- what basis is notability founded upon? Though fashion and live performances may not be a particular area of interest to some people, they are to many others. I think that both remain a crucial part of culture, mirroring the part in the section about the film "aesthetically" significant. Singer Madonna and designer Jean Paul Gaultier are arguably pioneers in their respective fields, who have shaped the current landscape of culture significantly (while Wikipedia is sorely inadequate in the field of haute couture, there are individual articles dedicated to explaining Madonna's cultural impact and fashion, as well as more "minor" things such as her business, fashion brand ventures and the phenomenon of "wannabe" impersonators of Madonna)

I am hoping to retain this part with enhancements to its content. I concede that, perhaps, the examples of Madonna and Jean Paul Gaultier may be too few to fully justify the grand impact the film has had on culture. I am wondering if it would be better to mention the film's influence on additional figures such as David Bowie and Jun Takahashi in their art?

I hope you see where I am coming from! As someone with background in couture and music media archiving, it is important to me that the film's influence on these areas be represented. Thanks! Gaultieresque (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would suggest discussing this on the talk page of the article. Please also read the guidelines as to what constitutes a minor edit, as any addition of content shouldn't be marked as minor. NEDOCHAN (talk) 08:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]