User talk:Movsum.Mirzazada

Welcome!

Hello, Movsum.Mirzazada, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Movsum.Mirzazada, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 03:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Fancy Refrigerator,

I hope this message finds you well.

First and foremost, I want to sincerely apologize if any of my recent edits or page creations caused confusion or disruption on Wikipedia. I am currently working on establishing and aligning my digital identity, and as someone doing this entirely independently, I acknowledge there may have been some missteps in the process. Please rest assured I am actively correcting and learning as I go.

For years, I’ve been managing every aspect of my public and professional life myself — including film appearances, awards, and online presence — without formal representation or agency support. Now, as I try to bring it all into platforms like Wikipedia and Wikidata with full transparency and respect for community guidelines, I find that certain areas are understandably challenging or unfamiliar.

I would be truly grateful if you could offer any guidance or support — whether it’s about content standards, formatting corrections, or the appropriate paths for building a valid and notable presence. I’m here to learn, not to overstep. Your help would mean a lot to someone who's simply trying to do this the right way.

Thank you for your time and the incredible work you do in maintaining the quality of this platform. I look forward to improving with your advice.

Warm regards,

Movsum Mirzazada Movsum.Mirzazada (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What you are describing is self-promotion. Please note that Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Conflict of interest editing such as writing autobiographies is also discouraged. If you genuinely believe that you are notable, please consider submitting a draft through the Wikipedia Article wizard. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 04:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the welcome and message I already have third-party sources such as film festival records, IMDb profile, press coverage, and interviews.

I understand that I should not create the article directly, so I would like your help to do this the correct way.

Could you please guide me:

Should I use the Article Wizard to create a draft?
What format or style should I follow?
Can I share my sources list with you to check if they are acceptable?

Also, if possible, I’d like to ask for help from someone who has experience with biographies of living people so I don’t make any mistakes. Thank you for your time and help!

– Movsum.Mirzazada Movsum.Mirzazada (talk) 06:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb, profiles, press releases, and interviews are not reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Movsum.Mirzazada

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Movsum.Mirzazada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 03:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting the Speedy Deletion of Wikipedia Page for Movsum Mirzazada

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --Movsum.Mirzazada (talk) 04:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to respectfully contest the nomination for speedy deletion of the Wikipedia page for Movsum Mirzazada (also known as Mimo, Mirmovsum Mirzazada, Mövsüm Mirzəzadə). I believe the page meets the notability criteria for biographies of living persons due to my documented professional accomplishments and public recognition as an Azerbaijani actor and entrepreneur.

To support this, I have added verifiable references from reliable third-party sources, including:

Coverage of my acting roles in internationally recognized films such as End of Season (2019), which won the FIPRESCI Award at the Rotterdam International Film Festival 2021.

Documented awards for my acting performance at the Moscow Premiere Film Festival of CIS Countries.

Listings on IMDb and other film databases establishing my filmography and career.

Multiple interviews and media profiles in independent publications confirming my professional work and entrepreneurial ventures.

I am committed to improving the page further to ensure it fully complies with Wikipedia’s guidelines, including adding more detailed citations and neutral, well-sourced content. I kindly request that the deletion process be paused to allow time for these improvements.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I appreciate the efforts of the Wikipedia community in maintaining quality and reliability.

Best regards, Movsum Mirzazada (Mimo)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Movsum.Mirzazada/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Movsum.Mirzazada! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Mimo's Draft

Hello — I’ve been working alone on Draft:Movsum Mirzazada for several months and would appreciate a quick set of eyes before I resubmit to AfC. I’m new to Wikidata/Wikipedia and some parts are confusing; I may have lost original source details. Could someone assist live or point to festival/program pages or independent profiles that would me AfC notability? Thank you very much. Movsum.Mirzazada (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Movsum Mirzazada (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Movsum Mirzazada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== For AfC reviewers == '''One-line summary:''' Revised draft: added independent citations (IFFR, Quinzaine, Cineuropa, epd, AZERTAC, Trend/Day.Az, Silk Road, BIAFF, EWIP), removed promotional wording, standardized name; birth date/place omitted pending independent verification.

'''Cover note:''' I have revised Draft:Movsum Mirzazada and prepared it for AfC review.

Summary of changes

Converted references to citation templates and added independent, third‑party sources supporting the main notability claims (Quinzaine des Cinéastes, IFFR, Cineuropa, epd Film, AZERTAC, Trend.az/Day.Az, Silk Road, BIAFF, EWIP catalogue).
Rewrote to remove promotional phrasing and ensured a neutral tone.
Standardized name in infobox and lead to: Movsum Mirzazada (born Mir‑Movsum Mirzazade).
Omitted birth date/place from the lead and infobox pending independent reliable sourcing.
Moved database/self‑published entries to External links and flagged them as databases (Kinobiz/Kino‑Teatr/Filmportal/MUBI/IMDb/RottenTomatoes).
Noted lack of free‑license portrait images (Getty editorial images exist but are rights‑managed).

Key sources (representative)

Notes for reviewers

The article relies on festival programmes and independent European reviews that name the subject and discuss his roles; these are intended to substantiate WP:NACTOR notability.
Birth date/place remain omitted until an independent reliable source is provided.
No free‑license portrait is available for Commons; Getty holds editorial photos (rights‑managed).

Request Please consider this draft for AfC review. I welcome guidance on any additional sources that would strengthen the article (especially independent interviews or national/international profiles). Movsum.Mirzazada (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Movsum.Mirzazada Please stop communicating with an AI chatbot. qcne (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]