Here's my talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minerva Koenig (April 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Information and sources are simply not significant for what our standards accept.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Minerva Koenig has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minerva Koenig. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minerva Koenig has been accepted

[edit]
Minerva Koenig, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Waggie (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Santa Teresa de Jesús Catholic Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Sources are either not reliable or fail to provide significant coverage. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 20:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Minerva9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Santa Teresa de Jesús Catholic Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minerva9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Santa Teresa de Jesús Catholic Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]