User talk:MasterBlasterofBarterTown

Welcome

Welcome and great username! Feoffer (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Woke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Polygnotus (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 21:50, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Charlie Kirk, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of July 4th, 2025 Alvarado ICE Attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article July 4th, 2025 Alvarado ICE Attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 4th, 2025 Alvarado ICE Attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

EvergreenFir (talk) 15:09, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:53, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User seems to be here solely to push an agenda. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

academic sources on transgender extremism

You mentioned finding a few of these at ani, do you mind sharing these? LunaHasArrived (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good things come to those who wait :p MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic-banned from American politics post-1992, broadly construed and explicitly including political activists, political commentators, and events that are of political significance (e.g. mass shootings).

You have been sanctioned based on the disruptive, BATTLEGROUND editing documented here.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Wikipedia:Contentious topics § Appeals and amendments. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 20:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]