User talk:Marcus chullus

This is Marcus chullus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Marcus chullus!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:24, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all inline external links from the draft, there should be no links pointing to external resources until the 'References' section. Convert the ones that could be used as references into inline citations. It would also be much preferred that you cite your sources by way of inline citations, rather than merely listing them at the end without citing; that way it would be much easier to see where each bit of the content has come from, and how much of this is unreferenced. See WP:REFB for advice on referencing using the preferred method of dynamic inline citations and footnotes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Marcus chullus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marcus chullus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please tidy up the remainder of the numbered headings. I did a great many and decided it was your job. Read and apply MOS:HEAD, and remove all extraneous heading formatting

Remove "How to Register Patents and Intellectual Property Rights in Nepal". See WP:NOTHOWTO

Why is "Sources of Intellectual Property (IP) Law" present? What is so special about Nepal's legislature?

"Some of the Prominent Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Cases Global Cases" Why?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Marcus chullus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:24, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Intellectual property in Nepal

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Intellectual property in Nepal. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also note that I've done some further cleanup to bring this in line with Wikipedia articles in this style: by moving generic content to a "Background" section and bringing the paragraph about Nepal to the lead, this more naturally follows Wikipedia's style. I also removed the infobox, as this article is on a topic and not one specific law. If there is some work you want to save from the infobox, you can find it in the page history. I also removed the over-extensive section headings and external links. Let me know if you have any questions. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]