User talk:Marcodicaprio

Non-free rationale for File:Theme from the Persuaders cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Theme from the Persuaders cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 16:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hi Marcodicaprio! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Electronic rock and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. MossOnALog^Talk 20:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Fugs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Godz and David Peel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Visions Vol 1 Lufthaus.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Visions Vol 1 Lufthaus.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sosna deletion

Hiya - you should make your statement (with a bolded Keep vote) on the project page, not the talk page. I'd move it for you but some people would see that as high handed! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Under the Radar Vol 3 Robbie Williams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Under the Radar Vol 3 Robbie Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Commonwealth (The Beatles Song)

added links pointing to Two of Us and Can You Dig It?

Claus Theo Gärtner

added a link pointing to Der Alte

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm Patar knight. I noticed that you have been adding short descriptions to articles. However, the short descriptions you added are too long to be effective, such as at The Palace of the King of the Birds. The guideline is that short descriptions should ideally be under 40 characters long, and no longer than needed. For more information, see the short description guidelines. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 09:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM usage

Please stop using an LLM (such as ChatGPT) to generate articles wholesale like you've recently been doing. I've looked at a few that you've made and they are all very problematic, and will likely be reverted. Perryprog (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I use chatgpt to gather info but most of the articles are written and fixed by me. I think the articles should be kept because trout mask replica is an important album and the tracks should have wikipedia entries Marcodicaprio (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I always check if the info are correct and I fix the articles to see if everything is accurate. I use gtps only to gather information across the sources Marcodicaprio (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but what changes you have been doing to ChatGPT's output is far from sufficient. You are clearly not fact checking anything it outputs, and the prose you've been adding all needs to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. Perryprog (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am fact checking everything indeed because I have those books about Beefheart Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't believe you. In every single edit I've checked you've added multiple references to non-existent sources. You can't fact check things if the sources, again, do not exist. Perryprog (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources about my articles on beefheart songs do exist. I often mention two books, Mike Barnes captain beefheart's biography and John French, beefheart through the eyes of magic.

There's another book that I own and I didn't mention about all the songs in Trout Mask Replica by Francesco Nunziata in Italian, Captain Mask Replica. I even know personally the author, so you can't say I'm lying. Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention the book by nunziata and to report other info in my articles indeed. So you can't say I don't check if the references are true or not Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to Old Fart at Play has a link to All About Jazz to an article that doesn't exist, and a quick search shows they've never had an article titled that, and it also has a link to a Guardian article that has never existed.
This edit to Hair Pie has a reference to "Hair Pie: Bake 1" which doesn't seem to exist, though it's hard to tell because none of the citations are made using citation templates.
This edit to Ant Man Bee has the same non-existent Guardian article, as well as an invalid ISBN for Barnes (2000).
This edit to Sugar 'n Spikes references the same non-existent All About Jazz article and has an ISBN for French (2010) that's for an unrelated book.
This edit to Trouble Every Day has multiple mistakes in its use of citation templates, a reference to Greene (2016) that fails verification, a reference to Lowe (2007) with a page number that is an entirely blank page, a reference to "Rough Trade" that doesn't exist and which has a retrieved date of 2019.

Perryprog (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article all about jazz exists https://www.allaboutjazz.com/trout-mask-replica__29404 and about the guardian, I don't remember if I referenced the one that talked about Beefheart in general https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/nov/28/artist-captain-beefheart-paint-don-van-vliet Marcodicaprio (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think it's an injustice that you deleted those articles because they disclose important information about those songs but if you don't want to keep them, I don't think I would repost or fix them because I spent a lot of time to gather information and check them. I'm sorry if there were some mistakes but they could've been fixed instead of deleting the entire articles Marcodicaprio (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I only undid one of your edits as I didn't have the time to check over every single article, which you were creating sometimes as close as seven minutes apart. (Definitively not a long time.) I did report this on the AI Cleanup Noticeboard, however, where uninvolved editors will review your edits.

You are correct that the All About Jazz article did exist—I'm not sure why it didn't show up in my search (a second check shows it much further down in the results than I checked), but that doesn't change the fact that you blindly copied the incorrect URL from the LLM output indicating that you never actually checked that source. The same applies to the Guardian article "Mission: Unlistenable – Reappraising Captain Beefheart" —you repeatedly referenced this article, but it doesn't exist.

The onus is not on me to spend hours fixing the dozens and dozens of articles you made every ten to twenty minutes apart. It's even more frustrating that you've repeatedly lied to me saying, multiple times, that you checked all of your edits and their sources, which again you clearly have not. Perryprog (talk) 21:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hair Pie moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hair Pie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 21:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]