User talk:LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle! Thank you for your contributions. I am UY Scuti and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —UY Scuti ^Talk(pka, JAaron95) 12:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Your recent editing history at Remigration shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the info, I was unaware of the 3 revert rule. I will definitely make sure to follow. But I believe my reverts were reasoned and follow Wikipedia guidelines unlike the people who's edits I had to undo. LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're edit warring again at Remigration. Please consider following WP:BRD, a best practice for working through content disputes. If a bold new change of yours is reverted for good-faith reasons, please start a talk page discussion and wait until there's consensus to restore it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but I don't believe it was. I gave short solid reasons citing Wikipedia policy. Ivanvector cited [[CITESPAM]] when it's relevant to the content and I've never cited it before. LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanvector's full edit summary was "POV language inappropriately sourced to the organizations' own publications. Citation to UKIP's "Manifesto" adds nothing and is bordering on WP:CITESPAM." You can disagree with that last part (I do too), but there was sufficient reason provided to make a re-revert inappropriate. Since you are interested in editing controversial topics, please dial up the AGF and dial back the edit warring. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay yes. I was actually halfway through an edit changing the pov language to be more neutral before the current edit was put through reverting my addition.

But I struggle to see the ivanvector revert as good faith when a Wikipedia administrator with 10's of thousands of edits blatantly misusesWP:CITESPAM to negatively characterise my edits LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]