User talk:L'durre vital

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, L'durre vital! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

English usage

[edit]

Hi there,

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions! It's great to see new editors getting involved.

I noticed that some of your edits ([1]) contain a few issues with grammar and phrasing. Since Wikipedia is an English-language encyclopedia, clear and correct language helps ensure that articles remain accessible and professional.

If you're unsure about how to phrase something, feel free to use the Wikipedia:Teahouse – there are lots of editors who are happy to help improve wording.

Your efforts are appreciated, and I hope you continue to edit and grow as a contributor. Omnipaedista (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsensical content to Wikipedia. --Omnipaedista (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychoanalysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prove. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYNTH

[edit]

Please stop adulterating what the sources actually say as you did here. Any further changes will be reported for edit warring. --Omnipaedista (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Omni Why revert the following text?

"This criticism of unfalsifiability is mainly directed against the mental aspect of the three-instance model. However, Freud never claimed that the acts of consciousness could be scientifically proven or derived from material contexts such as those of our brain. Instead, he linked these "two end points of our knowledge" to the classical mind–body problem[1][2][3][4] additionally recommending replacing Kant's a priori with the conditions of the psychic apparatus.[5]"--L'durre vital (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:SYNTH: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." --Omnipaedista (talk) 06:21, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. What conclusion is being formulated or implied? I wrote: ‘additionally recommending replacing Kant's a priori with the conditions of the psychic apparatus.’ This is a quote from ONE separated source. L'durre vital (talk) 09:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Freud, Sigmund (1972). Abriss der Psychoanalyse (in German). Gesammelte Werke (17 ed.). Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag. pp. 63–138, esp.: 67–69.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference HP was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Schött, Margerete; Schmidt, Anna-Christine (2021). "neuropsychoanalysis". Dorsch Lexikon der Psychologie (in German).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference ReferenceA was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference Gesammelte Werke was invoked but never defined (see the help page).