User talk:Kivercik

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kivercik! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kivercik, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yayvantepe, Midyat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

asilvering (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Deq (tattoo). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. There are issues with your editing on Deq. Please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, especially the "Due and undue weight" section. Semsûrî (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Deq (tattoo). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Semsûrî (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject

Hey! I have noticed your contributions to what is considered within the scope of Wikiproject:Aram (Suryoye) and would like to invite you to it. You could add your name very easily to the list of members here. Wlaak (talk) 12:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Midyat Guest House. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aramean people

Notifying you of this AfD as you are one of the editors who has extensively contributed to this draft. You're welcome to participate in the discussion once your block has expired. -- asilvering (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]