User talk:Kimlabs1996

Kimlabs1996, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kimlabs1996! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Prunet-Foch (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by J947 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs a bit more significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:André Prunet-Foch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:André Prunet-Foch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 04:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Creating a new login so that you don't get multiple warnings for repeatedly making the same disruptive edit won't prevent you getting blocked. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 05:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Fences&Windows 18:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem confused about using accounts when you're blocked: you aren't allowed to use any while User:Kimley Labasan is blocked. I don't know why you were tolerated to sock for so long, but you are subject to this block as a person, not just that account. You need to successfully appeal that block before you edit English Wikipedia again, see Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. You can appeal it using a different account if you've lost access to that account. You need to stay away from any accounts for 6 months, though you can edit other language Wikipedias and other projects like Wikimedia Commons. Fences&Windows 19:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this account is not a sockpoppet of any user Kimlabs1996 (talk) 11:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was confirmed: "This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Kimley Labasan (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely." Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kimley Labasan/Archive#01 February 2021. Fences&Windows 11:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]