User talk:Jvtorres
Documents to review:
HCB 20/SEP/2015: http://www.ich.org/ichnews/publications/browse/article/the-values-and-benefits-of-ich-to-industry.html
The article List of Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be a subjective list
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as List of Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.