User talk:Junekramer1

Your deletion

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Bilzerian, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Paul Bilzerian, you may be blocked from editing. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Junekramer1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 16:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:32, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for egregiously promotional editing, most likely as an undisclosed paid editor, per your editing of Paul Bilzerian. I have noted your attempts to shut out the IP reverting your removals of negative content from the article,[1][2] instead of going to the article's talkpage to discuss with them. That's a pretty disruptive course of action, and your claim that your own version of the page is "updated with neutral point of view" fails to convince. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 22:08, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junekramer1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Edits removed were only made by the IP 184.153.21.19 which did significant modifications to the page, no other editor content was removed. i will use the talk page to communicate other editors moving forwards. owning a photo does not mean 'egregiously promotional editing' and all edited information by me was cited from published articles. Thank you for considering my application to unblock

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not address the issue of likely undisclosed paid editing or at the very least substantial conflict of interest. To be considered, you will need to make an unblock request which directly and unambiguously addresses these. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Junekramer1 (talk) 22:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]