User talk:Jpuxfrd

Welcome!

Hello, Jpuxfrd, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ҉N҉҉X҉҉c҉҉r҉҉y҉҉p҉҉t҉҉o҉ Message 05:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to 2024 Pacific hurricane season

Be careful when changing damage estimates. I believe you entered the one billion dollars in damage from Hurricane John due to the source's title, but the estimated billion was in pesos, not USD. I rolled back the edits. Jay Tee⛈️ 04:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The report states that all economic losses are provided in USD millions on page 36. However, I'm not too sure though. Jpuxfrd (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah my bad, I didn't see the report you added during your first edit and thought you added the $1 billion estimate w/o a source. Added your source to the John article. Jay Tee⛈️ 21:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 AHS

Hey there, regarding this edit, I disagree and suggest you revert. First off, "preliminary losses" are not useful when it's a long time after the fact. Also, because you're dealing with Guadeloupe, any damage total other than Euro or French franc should be ignored. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fire was on Antigua, not Guadeloupe (so the estimate is probably in Eastern Caribbean Dollars). Although preliminary estimates are not useful after a long time, if they are the only estimates available, should they still be used? (The source date was from October 2023) Jpuxfrd (talk) 01:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary reads as incomplete, so they're not ideal from a longterm point of view. And that's why I don't think they should be included in the damage total either. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 AHS

Regarding this edit, what do you mean "per Rafael's article". Was that information cited in the sources in the season article? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Jpuxfrd (talk) 21:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the source under the main article for clarification Jpuxfrd (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Wutip

List the source. MAS0802 15:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on 2025 Pacific Typhoon Season

Jpuxfrd (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK MAS0802 15:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Thanks for updating the damage totals for the recent storms in the South-West Indian Ocean. Sorry if our previous interactions haven't been the best, I saw that I called you out for some edits in the past. But I'm glad that didn't dissuade you from editing. It takes a lot of effort to make sure Wikipedia stays accurate and up to date, so cheers to you, Jpuxfrd, for making that happen! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:19, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jpuxfrd (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to List of California hurricanes

Thanks for adding both Kiko 07 and the recent Juliette to the California hurricanes list. One small thing. When you're linking to the storm events, it's good to link directly to the report, [Storm Events Database - like this. I'm only pointing it out because you seem to be the sort of editor who's going to stick around and maybe edit these kind of lists in the future ;) Cheers and keep up the good work! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! Jpuxfrd (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Dalila (2025) (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Tropical Storm Lingling (2025). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The damage from this hurricane and the cost of the damage does not appear to be enough to warrant a stand-alone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Storm Dalila (2025) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpuxfrd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ivo

Do you think Ivo is notable enough for its own article? Thinking about making one HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:59, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure if Ivo deserves an article or not. The damage so far doesn't seem to be enough to warrant and article and the only place that Ivo seems to have impacted significantly would be Sinaloa. That being said, if you can find more information and impacts in places Ivo directly affected, I'd say go for it. JpuxfrdAlt (talk) 23:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Word counter

[1] - here ya go! Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 03:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Alvin (2025) has been accepted

Tropical Storm Alvin (2025), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:SANDWICH

Please make sure you understand this guideline grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point about MOS:SANDWICH, however, most tropical storm/hurricane articles have the track line that appears to be in the met history section. To compromise, I added a clear template after the lead. I hope this is okay. Jpuxfrd (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it looks like most articles might be violating that policy. The easiest solution would be to ignore all rules, but seeing that almost every tropical cyclone article violates said rule, that might not be the best idea. A better solution that accommodates the MOS might be to incorporate the track map into the infobox. I'll propose that on the project talk page. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can see justification for inclusion in infobox; it'd be similar role to mapframes in like place infoboxes. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See the project discussion here, sounds like thousands of articles are about to get changed because of this very discussion. Not that I'm complaining, I think the change is an improvement! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Baja California Peninsula hurricanes

Hey there, do you think the list should be split between Baja California and Baja California Sur? Most of them will be in the latter, but there were a small few that hit Baja California classic. Seeing that almost every coastal U.S. state has its own list, I figured Mexico and even Canada could have the same. There's surely enough info. That would make it easier later on to justify having just List of Sonora hurricanes, and not lumping them both together, even though there was historically the state of Sonora and Sinaloa! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would probably be necessary. Baja California classic hurricanes tend to be somewhat rare and might be more of note. Additionally, many hurricanes have hit Mexico and I don't see why we couldn't have separate articles for each state. Jpuxfrd (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Hurricane Nora (1997) was the last hurricane to hit Baja California classic, and possibly the only. Also, having hurricane lists for two Mexican states might inspire people to make more state lists. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]