User talk:Joseph Cereza

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Perez Dizon (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Joseph Cereza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vince Dizon have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vince Dizon was changed by Joseph Cereza (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931188 on 2025-09-21T04:48:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:48, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Perez Dizon

[edit]

Created a biography of PBGen Andre Dizon. Joseph Cereza (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Andre Perez Dizon, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Since you had already created Draft:Andre Perez Dizon, I am declining the sandbox version and resubmitting the actual draft for review at AfC.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Perez Dizon (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:32, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]