User talk:Jean Abou Samra

Diagonal argument

I noticed that you introduced the link Diagonal argument in the article Rice–Shapiro theorem. Unfortunately, Diagonal argument is a disambiguation page and not an article. As I have no knowledge of higher mathematics, I can not see what the correct link is that should be used? Can you take a look and fix that issue?

And to push my luck, can you also look at Riemann mapping theorem, Constructive analysis and Locally convex topological vector space that have the same link. Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 20:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, none of these links would be fitting since diagonal arguments are a type of proof, and all the links on the Diagonal argument disambiguation page are merely links to other theorems whose proof, like the Rice-Shapiro theorem, is/uses a diagonal argument. If anything, the right action would be to convert Diagonal argument from a disambiguation page into a general page explaining what a diagonal argument is, and linking to those other pages in the "See also" section. I'm not volunteering to write that page right now, though. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, not the answer I expected but it gives me a way forward. I have added Diagonal argument (proof technique) to the dab-page and will convert the articles accordingly. The Banner talk 11:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TheoretiCS

The article TheoretiCS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TheoretiCS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TheoretiCS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheoretiCS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Randykitty (talk) 08:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twisted cubic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parametrization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]