User talk:Jason Potel

AfC notification: User:Jason Potel/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Jason Potel/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Leon (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha Monarch was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per as WP:BAREURLS needs the Reference URL fixed, Take look at WP:CITE for formatting the ref list. Since bare URLs is considered as unsuitable for Wikipedia. Take a look at WP:MOS for full detailed content styling. Revert to me (via talk page) once the links are fixed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 MONARCH Talk to me 10:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adam Leon has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adam Leon. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Leon (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The film might be notable (plenty of decent reviews) but there is almost no coverage of Leon himself. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. As a reminder, PRIMARY sources such as interviews are discouraged, and IMDb is never a suitable reference.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 22:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]