User talk:Jag1762010

Welcome!

Hi Jag1762010! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 11:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not made any misleading edits. YOU are the one implying she is connected to terrorist groups with links that don't even assert she is connected to any terrorist actions. I have put her page on "wikipedias biography of living persons notice board" myself. Jag1762010 (talk) 17:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but you know that there are a lot of misleading External links which are fully against the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you don't know about this i strongly recommend you read it carefully. Thank you Martial Bean Dino (talk) 23:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any evidence of that. Either way, other users have seemed to have cleaned up that page, WITHOUT making false accusations of association with terrorism. Jag1762010 (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In recent contributions i keeps the same data as was contributed by you. I have just Fix the errors related to WP:MOS and remove unreliable sources like Twitter, but not removed tweets. Martial Bean Dino (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You also tried to bring back the false accusations against her of being associated with terrorist groups. Don't try to act like you didn't, Your previous edit is saved in the archive. Jag1762010 (talk) 11:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are false allegations against me. Also I removed BLA linked with Mahrang Baloch. Martial Bean Dino (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can all see what was in your previous edits, so don't try to act all innocent. Jag1762010 (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you find that i have made a mistake, you can Report me to ANI. Thank you Martial Bean Dino (talk) 12:13, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, great defense sockpuppet Jag1762010 (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opinion polling for the next Turkish parliamentary election (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Opinion polling for the next Turkish parliamentary election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 13:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

William Lloyd Garrison

Please get consensus on talk page for a change to that heading. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 23:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]