User talk:I find V to be V

July 2024

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User:68.54.105.23/sandbox, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was my sandboxaling box I find V to be V (talk) 00:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -WikiFew (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted political bias changes to “2024 Stock market decline”

I undid your changes to this page calling it the “Kamala crash.” The source you provided is invalid as it shows only one person using that term, not “many” as you originally stated.

I can also tell you're fairly new to Wikipedia and have already received a warning for vandalism. I suggest you read Wikipedia’s terms and policies again. Here at Wikipedia, we don’t push a political narrative.

@WikiFew John Bois (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t give me that bullshit. Wikipedia is extremely biased, and pushes a political narrative (as all mainstream media does), just look at any conservative’s page, its all riddled with immense bullshit. I find V to be V (talk) 22:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be editing here long with that attitude. I suggest you stop being so negative about the project and your fellow editors. This is a collaborative project, not a battleground. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m simply trying to give the average reader both sides of the narrative, not just the liberal side. I find V to be V (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This story has been heard by probably more than half the earth's population (4 billion+). When nearly 75% of those people call it the "Kamala crash," you'll be able to add it back.

I also suggest you fix your tone before it results in another warning. This is a civilized community where we have civilized discussions. John Bois (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way half the world has heard about this crash. The article is literally nominated for deletion. I find V to be V (talk) 23:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Newspaper. John Bois (talk) 23:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is ridiculous to say considering a vast majority of people get their information on current and historical topics from Wilipedia. I find V to be V (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! I find V to be V, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aaron Kosminski, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anti-semitism is not allowed in wikipedia articles. Your edit has been reverted. The text added (from short article that uses 'dismemberment' twenty-nine times) is used in such a way to ascribe guilt to a suspect based entirely on the fact that he was a Jew. Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 07:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Mangione

What you did there, please don't do it again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad bro you must admit though the article sucks and the guy is irrelevant I find V to be V (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 04:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Brandon Sakburn.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Brandon Sakburn.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fuentes2025.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Fuentes2025.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 20:13, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I told you, “ser”. This has a credible claim of fair use. Please kindly remove the speedy deletion nomination and update Fuentes’ page. Thank you for your attention to this matter! I find V to be V (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sneako2024.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sneako2024.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Fuentes2025.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Fuentes2025.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me which category of “not wanting to build an encyclopedia” I specifically fall into? I read the entire thing and none of them represent me. I’ve made many beneficial edits. I find V to be V (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]