User talk:Housecatnyc

July 2025

(edit conflict) response prior to blanking: This and the above are clearly copy-and-paste messages from an AI chatbot, and by policy can be entirely disregarded

You've used your sandbox to write a promotional article on a housing corporation in NYC, your userpage (against policy, and have been warned previously by @FULBERT) to write about the CEO of the same corporation, you've recreated the draft article Draft:Plocamium Holdings LLC on the same corpoaration, and your username is Housecatnyc.

In your own words, what is your connection to the subjects you are writing about. Do not use an AI chatbot to write your response for you. If you are being paid, all that the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements require of you are to disclose.

Thank you, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note, Bobby.

To clarify: I have no personal, professional, or financial relationship with Plocamium Holdings, James Tannahill, or any related entity. I am not being paid for any edits, nor do I represent or speak on behalf of the subjects mentioned.

Additionally, the content I drafted was not generated by an AI chatbot. All language was written manually, using publicly available sources with proper citation formatting. I also understand and apply correct punctuation and grammar. My intent was to create a well-sourced, neutrally written article to assess whether the subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. I am a practicing attorney who enjoys research and writing.

I respect the community’s policies regarding userpages, tone, and article neutrality. If anything I’ve created falls short, I’m happy to revise it, move it to the draft namespace, or submit it through Articles for Creation for appropriate review.

I appreciate your time and the feedback. Housecatnyc (talk) 13:51, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So do it then. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

will do, thanks. I will redo. 72.43.121.35 (talk) 14:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you persist in writing about related topics, and getting grief for doing so if you have no connection to them? Why don't you make useful edits on other topics. I came here to block you as an undisclosed paid editor, but since you claim vehemently that you are not, let's see what happen. Courtesy ping @Bobby Cohn: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You won't be able to move it, it's been deleted. So don't recreate the same thing again, it's clearly promotional and been deleted multiple times now. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ricardo De La Blanca Brigati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ricardo De La Blanca Brigati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SPOOKYDICAE👻 20:38, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. You previously stated you have no connections to the subjects you have written about.

Please explain how this professional photo is your own work, yet you have no connection to this person? SPOOKYDICAE👻 20:40, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Found it online Housecatnyc (talk) 03:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then, why did you say it's your own work when it was not? And if you were dishonest about that, why are any of us supposed to think you're honest about not being paid to edit? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:04, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I was paid don't you think I'd do a better job? Housecatnyc (talk) 03:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did not answer the question that I asked. Don't respond to a question with a question. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid. If I'm dishonest in the article please flag it as you review on the basis of fact. Otherwise your claim may not be accurate. Housecatnyc (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then, while I'm still not sure I believe you, I'm willing to convert your block into a partial block from editing mainspace. You would still be able to write a draft and request review by articles for creation, and participate on article talk pages, but you would not be able to edit or create articles directly. You're clearly not ready to do that. Would you agree to that? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.