User talk:HCPM

Welcome!

Hello, HCPM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Oslo Mosquito Raid (1944) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and as been tagged. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 02:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yea i know i apologise, i was meant to do alot more then i have done by now for it but its just... there is not alot of sources that are easily citable or easy to find online? so i understand your point fully, i didnt expect it to be this hard to find evidence on it, hopefully going down to a IWM to find some archived stuff on it though but thats not until the 25th

again i deeply apologise HCPM (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Finding good sources can be tough. I just added one to the article to help out. Once it gets >2 quality ones, the tag can be removed.

Thank you for your contribution, and send me a message if you need any help. We’re glad to have you!

Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 03:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

any recommendations on where to find this sort of documentation online? all I knew about this specific raid was a single sentence in a book and word of mouth and im pretty new to researching on the web

also can i ask a slight favour of you looking at this Oslo Mosquito Raid (1942) article? just to make sure all my changes are inline, the previous one was rather lacking but i dont know if ive correctly added the new content HCPM (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. thank you so much for the source!!!! HCPM (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello HCPM! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Improving article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]