User talk:HCPM
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, HCPM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Oslo Mosquito Raid (1944) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and as been tagged. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 02:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- yea i know i apologise, i was meant to do alot more then i have done by now for it but its just... there is not alot of sources that are easily citable or easy to find online? so i understand your point fully, i didnt expect it to be this hard to find evidence on it, hopefully going down to a IWM to find some archived stuff on it though but thats not until the 25th
- again i deeply apologise HCPM (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- No worries! Finding good sources can be tough. I just added one to the article to help out. Once it gets >2 quality ones, the tag can be removed.
- Thank you for your contribution, and send me a message if you need any help. We’re glad to have you!
- Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 03:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- any recommendations on where to find this sort of documentation online? all I knew about this specific raid was a single sentence in a book and word of mouth and im pretty new to researching on the web
- also can i ask a slight favour of you looking at this Oslo Mosquito Raid (1942) article? just to make sure all my changes are inline, the previous one was rather lacking but i dont know if ive correctly added the new content HCPM (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- p.s. thank you so much for the source!!!! HCPM (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello HCPM! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Adding your own commentary
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Reptile Zoo, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
I don't think you've read WP:SOAPBOX, WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS or WP:RS. There is a good reason that change.org and other petitions sites are blacklisted; Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If you violate this policy again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hello HCPM! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
June 2025
[edit] Your recent editing history at Dunkirk evacuation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:21, 18 June 2025 (UTC)