User talk:Greenbigapple

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visslan (August 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:47, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Greenbigapple! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:47, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thank you for your very quick review!
ChatGPT was indeed used, but only to write the text in the correct formatting. I myself wrote the text (and linked the sources used next to it), and asked ChatGPT to write it so it would look nice on Wikipedia, including the table and correct referencing.
I will make adjustments to the article for where it might need refining text-wise to feel more natural.
Please reconsider the article with the abovementioned in mind!
Best regards Greenbigapple (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visslan (August 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insillaciv was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Insillaciv (talk) 11:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]