User talk:GreenEyewash

Welcome!

Hi GreenEyewash! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:USvFlynnDocket.259.1.detail.png

Thanks for uploading File:USvFlynnDocket.259.1.detail.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:USvFlynnDocket.248.2.detail.png

Thanks for uploading File:USvFlynnDocket.248.2.detail.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi GreenEyewash! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Direct new page creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GreenEyewash. Thank you for your work on All Rise News. Another editor, Lorraine Crane, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello! please add more independent sources with significant coverage about the subject. to prevent deletion. You can check this to help. Cheers! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#significant_coverage

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lorraine Crane}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lorraine Crane (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lorraine Crane:

Thank you for reviewing the article I recently started on All Rise News, and for your critique. I would greatly appreciate any further guidance you can offer me regarding its shortcomings.

Specifically, I could use some help in understanding what sort of additional source would constitute "significant coverage" for a company like All Rise News. I am guessing that mere publication of its work in various outlets does not count regardless of the number of such outlets or published articles. If I understand correctly, I need look out for secondary sources that discuss All Rise News as opposed to merely publishing its work.

I am a follower of Adam Klasfeld, who I consider to be a significant and worthwhile established journalist. I created the article when he started writing under the “All Rise News” banner (rather than just under his name), and I saw this promotion on MeidasTouch. There seems to be a lot of mutual backscratching by podcasters, and this source does not seem to pass muster as “arm’s length”.

I will look out for “third-party” references to All Rise News, but so far there do not appear to be any. Did I “jump the gun”, or is it worthwhile (as I had decided) to have an article for the emerging brand of a significant journalist? Also, can you please advise me on how long I have to remedy this before the article might be deleted?

GreenEyewash (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2025 (UTC)GreenEyewash[reply]

Hello! You can actually check the link I shared you that discusses about significant coverage, but in a nutshell significant coverage or as we call it "SIGCOV" means that the subject or topic is spoken in depth, like its life, history, many details here and there, and not just a passing mention, or just a short Bio. think like footballers being mentioned only by name and with their statistics on a general sports stats page is not considered SIGCOV, as for the time limit before being possibly deleted, non really specific, as it depends whether or not our fellow wikipedians will notice it enough and may discuss and vote for its deletion or draftify etc. , speaking of Draftify, you may also choose to have it made back to a draft, so you can take time to build it up.. Lorraine Crane (talk) 19:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lorraine Crane:

Thanks for your advice. SIGCOV seems like a rather high bar, and my guess is that All Rise News will be having significant audience and impact for a long time before someone comes along to publish a story about them. However, I will keep a lookout for such a story.

GreenEyewash (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can always have it made to a draft to be safe, otherwise you are always welcome to add citations that you would see as likely SIGCOV based on the guidelines, and leave it to fellow wikipedians to critique. Worst case scenario even if it will be considered for deletion, you can participate in the discussion. All in all we get to learn something more each time, which I enjoy. Cheers! Lorraine Crane (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lorraine Crane:

Thanks for your further suggestions. I think that rather than revert to a draft, I will dilligently continue to seek additional citations that support SGIGCOV. Given that I don't know Adam Klasfeld from Adam, I feel that my robust efforts on the page are completely legitimate.

On a personal note, I noticed on User:Lorraine_Crane that you are a "growing polyglot". I recently discovered on YouTube an astounding exchange about Multilingualism between Noam Chomsky and Sasha Baron Cohen that you may enjoy. One may ask: Is Chomsky "slow on the uptake", or is he a comedian's ultimate "straight man"?

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo All Rise News.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo All Rise News.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK with me for this file to be deleted --- now that the newpage patroller has turned my All Rise News article into a redirect. GreenEyewash (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]