User talk:FrasalvaGmg

This is FrasalvaGmg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FrasalvaGmg/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrasalvaGmg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FrasalvaGmg/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobby, do you think an internation association with thousand participants in 15 years has no relevance? Of course I do not have "reliable" sources up to your judment, but you should provid which one do you consider reliables? Books printed, Newspaper articles, 12 congresses organised...furthermore Municipalities supports and FCT (Portuguese ministerial education institution) are not reliable?...what do you want. I'm an engineer, not accepting to be refused without objective reasons you must specify while refusing to accept volunteers contributes...Wikipedia lives on contributes and new voices, not on rejecting them. If so, I'm sorry to have contributed and paid for Wikipedia survival.regards. Dr.Eng. Giulio Salvadori FrasalvaGmg (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello FrasalvaGmg, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! Zinnober9 (talk) 12:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animusic (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusty Cat was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Animusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Rusty ^meow ~ 14:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animusic (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Animusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Dan arndt,

as an engineer, I try to be very precise and careful, absolutely reliable and objective, documenting all my actions in an objective and rational manner. I would kindly ask you to justify your denials by adding the reasons why do you require to use "reliable sources" without disputing the reliability of those sources I cited and which are considered absolutely reliable, the main ones, and which are very well known to everyone working in our specific field of "organologia". Animusic holds congresses that are scientific meetings, publishes books, organises workshops, etc.

The sources cited are among the most reliable in the world in their field:

Galpin Society : https://galpinsociety.org/ ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galpin_Society

Oberlin Conservatory : https://www.oberlin.edu/conservatory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberlin_Conservatory_of_Music

Historic Brass Soc. : https://historicbrass.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historic_Brass_Society

The Society of Ethnomusicology: https://www.ethnomusicology.org/? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Ethnomusicology

Universidade Evora: https://www.uevora.pt/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_%C3%89vora

Scottich Voices : https://scottishvoices.org/

Ancient Music of Ireland : https://www.ancientmusicireland.com/

and the books cited with their ISBNs.

Would you be so kind to let me know better what do you mean about: "his submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources".

Thanks for your support

best regards

Giulio Salvadori FrasalvaGmg (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not Dan Arndt but I may be able to help you understand. You will be pleased to hear that we have lots of documentation that will help you. If you want to summon someone in particular, please WP:PING them to get their attention.

Firstly, read through Your First Article; it will give you a good rundown of what to do.

From there, you may be interested in WP:42, which explains what you need in each and every source, as well as referencing for beginners. At present your draft is completely unreferenced, because everything you want to use as a reference is put at the very end. Instead you need inline citations. Importantly, referencing the home page of a website (which you have done with all your sources listed above) will be rejected - if a page of the website supports your text, we want you to reference the exact page.

Once you have assessed all your sources for the triple criteria in WP:42, and converted the acceptable sources into inline citations supporting the statements in your draft, you can try submitting the draft again. Happy editing! StartGrammarTime (talk) 06:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animusic (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cactusisme was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Animusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animusic (April 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]