User talk:Fragrant Peony

Rockall

Hi, I hope you're well.

Can you clarify please the concern you have with the source description I added that you revoked? I've updated the description further to now try to make it better

Thanks for any help.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Noticed your efforts in counter-vandalism....Keep it going! Volten001 ^☎ 13:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you Volten001 ^☎. Many thanks! - Fragrant Peony (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome...You're most welcome and happy editing Volten001 ^☎ 12:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks Lucifer in a maid outfit (talk) 04:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello

I'm KMLA(Korean Minjok Leadership Academy) student and I just deleted the wrong informations I hope you to allow it thanks --61.101.211.182 (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Burns Lake

I'm sorry about that, and I just want to remind that Burns Lake looks like the closest to the grographical centre of British Columbia to me. 112.202.138.214 (talk) 08:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LEBRON KING

	PICASSO
	sad im sorry what does fragrant peopy mean? why u edit what reliable source should we attest :((((((((((((((((((((((( Inspectah GAY (talk) 05:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism on The Twisted Childhood Universe

Hi there! I noticed that you reverted some vandalism to this article. Just a heads up, this is likely a sockpuppet of a blocked IP and continuation of vandalism from a similar IP range from the previous day. I've gone ahead and restored the last known good edit, and I'll put in an RPP request for this article now. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

L2: Empuraan (soundtrack)

Hey, can you revert the edits by user AnbareeV to this version. They have been making a lot of mess. And can you get someone to protect the page. HeisenberG (talk) 03:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fragrant Peony: Can you please look into this. Anbareev is continuously changing the article. HeisenberG (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done ✔️ Fragrant Peony (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But I am sure AnbareeV will continue their work. If they do, I will contact you, if you are okay with it. HeisenberG (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt's complicity

The charge of complicity does not concern whether the Rafah crossing was open, but rather the failure to prevent crimes against humanity. Egypt was added following discussions last June, so you cannot now come and go against that. Kindly undo your edit. Hauskasic (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need an actual legal statement not "opinions". For example, Italy literally provides Israel with military aid yet we removed it because there isn't a legal statement against it. You can check out List of military aid to Israel during the Gaza war. Fragrant Peony (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please raise this issue on the talk page if you wish to remove Egypt or any other country against which no legal proceedings have been initiated. Removing Egypt simply because Italy was removed is unjustified. Egypt has a much stronger connection to Gaza, which gives it various means to intervene and take meaningful action regarding what is happening. Hauskasic (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, it was already decided that "There *must* be legal proceedings against the countries", hence why countries that literally gave military aid to the IDF to directly kill Palestinians aren't all included. Your emotional bias isn't how we work on Wikipedia. WP:Policies.

Fragrant Peony (talk) 00:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I continue to engage respectfully. You should refrain from personalizing the discussion or reacting emotionally. Why was the United Kingdom not removed, then? It is worth noting that African organizations submitted a complaint against Egypt in April. Once again, I urge you to restore Egypt. [1] Hauskasic (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Due to Amnesty's legal action against the UK government, there is a literal court case against them. [2] Fragrant Peony (talk) 00:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Restore Egypt immediately. I can no longer tolerate your behavior! Hauskasic (talk) 00:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are engaged in an edit war by repeatedly reverting without consensus. Egypt will be reinstated whether you like it or not. It is listed under the 'Responsibility of third states' section below, if you care to look! Hauskasic (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]