User talk:FnDun

This is FnDun's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sur Les Murs (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sur Les Murs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greenman, no problem, It's my first full article so I'll try to improve.

Just to clarify - the problem is just that I used too few references and almost all from the TV station itself right? FnDun (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, to establish notability, sources need to be independent (as well as in-depth). Greenman (talk) 19:33, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greenman, sorry for all the questions!

I've added some more sources. A few are just passing but at least one of them is a reliable third party news source.

Should I resubmit, or do you think it needs more?

(for a 3-season tv show, it was hard to find articles!) FnDun (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally you want at least three really solid sources that are more than just passing mentions. If you're comfortable the threshold has been met, feel free to resubmit. It'll likely me someone else reviewing it next time. Greenman (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll try it again now.

Thanks for your help! FnDun (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FnDun! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lady Jday (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See also WP:NARTIST. Most of the sources are based on what Lady Jday says and generally by local publications including CBS which was local news. S0091 (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lady Jday and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]