Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

• The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
• The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Filmybuff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Filmybuff (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hi sir, no idea about the username policy, just choose onlyfilms, as it was mimicking onlyfans lol, Other than that, no intention or connection with any group. Choosen new name. Please guide. Thank you

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Onlyfilms (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir, @PhilKnight Filmybuff (talk) 08:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Priya Jain. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Routine business reporting, press releases, and other primary sources do not establish notability per WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leverage Edu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Filmybuff! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Filmybuff. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Filmybuff. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Filmybuff|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing

Thank you for your review. I would like to clarify that I am neither a paid contributor. I’m Film and Wikipedia enthusiast. My primary area of interest has always been films, as I’m passionate about cinema.

This was my first attempt at creating a corporate article. I chose this particular company because my cousin had traveled to the USA through it, So, thought of learning N:Corp articles as well. As inception, and also to be safer side I chose this company, it was the only one which had and Hindi article, but not an English one.https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%9C_%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%A1%E0%A5%81

I thought it would be safer and learning for me, to draft one in English as well.

I ensured to follow the submission guidelines carefully. However, I completely understand your concerns. I’m willing to refrain from further editing the article and continue focusing on my usual genre. Alternatively, if you permit, I would be glad to take some time to study WP:NCorp thoroughly and revisit the article after a few months with better understanding - Filmybuff (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Niafied were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leverage Edu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Niafied (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leverage Edu. Thanks! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a heads-up: Sukriti Veni has not received the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, and we have to be careful not to add such claims – there are several copycat awards using Dadasaheb Phalke's name, but none of them is notable. Non-notable awards should not be added to Wikipedia articles about actors, and people who did not receive the Dadasaheb Phalke Award should not be added to that category. --bonadea contributions talk 13:09, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bonadea My bad. As the subject was National Award winner, I believed that even Dadasaheb would be the right claim.

Thanks for making the article better. Will be careful in my next articles. - Filmybuff (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]