User talk:Feoffer

Anna Paulina on the JFK cameramen films can be included on Lee Oswald article

can you include on the LHO article? Apparently, there is some confusion to the moment when they are referring to either DARNELL or Wiegman film or both, although Anna Paulina Luna Task Force seem to said they would indeed write to NBC for the release of the original Darnell film, so perhaps both Darnell and Wiegman films can be written into “Other investigations and dissenting theories” section on the Lee Oswald article as recent events such as “in March 2025, Luna alleged, during a congressional hearing for the further release of documents related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, that efforts were underway to release a film taken by Dave Wiegman Jr. of NBC capturing the unidentified "prayer man" filmed during the assassination, theorized by some to have been Lee Harvey Oswald.^[1]” 77.99.93.28 (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC) 77.99.93.28 (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^ Jones, Kipp (March 29, 2025). "House Republican Claims NBC News Is Covering for JFK's Real Killer: Oswald 'Couldn't Have Been the Shooter'". Mediaite. Retrieved March 29, 2025.

Well, you don't need me to do that for you, I'm not special. Suggest it on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald see if it gets consensus or not. It might, or it might not. It might be more appropriately covered at Luna's bio, for example. After reading the source you cited, I'm not sure I actually know anything more about Oswald, but I certainly learned things about Luna for example. Feoffer (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to El Grande Americano, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Consensus would be needed first. Lemonademan22 (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Folk magic and the Latter Day Saint movement

Hello Feoffer, I have reverted some of your edits and wanted to explain myself. There are a lot of good edits here that you have made, so don't take my reverts of some things the wrong way. This topic is an incredibly difficult topic, fraught with all kinds of good and bad research and two centuries of obfuscation. It is important that for this topic in particular, that everything in it is backed up by high quality secondary sources. I think Dan Vogel does some great stuff, and I hope he publishes his work in a book, but he hasn't done so yet. You can find some things in his biography of Joseph Smith: Making of a Prophet though, and I highly recommend looking there. Epachamo (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie kirk was assassinated... change the name!

Charlie kirk was assassinated... change the name! 2600:4040:720A:E200:93A:47BE:425A:2AD3 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're preaching to the choir. Kirk was assassinated. I've argued that the name should be changed precisely as you suggest. Wikipedia move discussions take 7 days before an admin closes them, so it will be a few more days. In the mean time, remember that the text of the article uses the term assassination a lot and at the very top of the article. Feoffer (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Smith

Hello Feoffer, I saw your FAC notes at Talk:Joseph Smith, where you've been updating the article. I'm not knowledgeable enough to help out with drafting, but once you get far enough along in the process to seek input at Wikipedia:Peer review, I wanted to extend an invitation to {{ping}} me. Sometimes it is hard to find reviewers there, although it does seem like there are many active Mormon editors so perhaps you will have good luck regardless. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will do! :) Feoffer (talk) 20:24, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arcturians (New Age), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lindsay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duplication in Joseph_Smith#Views_and_teachings

One of your edits seems to have introduced a duplicated sentence, in each case followed by a sentence seemingly describing the same thing, but I'm not well-versed enough in the subject to tell if one of them is just fine to drop. Edef1c (talk) 05:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me! The article had been covering that circa 1831 with the priesthood restoration, but those teachings predate 1831, so I moved them up. I fixed it now, thanks! Feoffer (talk) 06:18, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was clearly having a bad month last November, when I should have awarded you this, but better late than never I hope. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Just wanted to swing by and express my appreciation for your efforts on the Joseph Smith article. I've had ambitions to take it to FA status several different times, but it's never quite happened. Whether you actually do take it to FA status or not, here's a barnstar for your efforts thus far - thank you.

Trevdna (talk) 04:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! Feoffer (talk) 16:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New article, Archives of the Impossible

Archives of the Impossible

I think I found out about it some time ago from you linking or mentioning something that led to it, and I finally got around to reading about it the past few days. I was surprised to find it was easy WP:GNG passing! — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work! thanks for reminding me! Feoffer (talk) 07:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Final Events for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Final Events is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Events until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please join the discussion

Don't have a lot of time to write links but please check the discussion here. NotBartEhrman (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Jones, Kipp (March 29, 2025). "House Republican Claims NBC News Is Covering for JFK's Real Killer: Oswald 'Couldn't Have Been the Shooter'". Mediaite. Retrieved March 29, 2025.

[1]