User talk:Feoffer

Archive

Anna Paulina on the JFK cameramen films can be included on Lee Oswald article

[edit]

can you include on the LHO article? Apparently, there is some confusion to the moment when they are referring to either DARNELL or Wiegman film or both, although Anna Paulina Luna Task Force seem to said they would indeed write to NBC for the release of the original Darnell film, so perhaps both Darnell and Wiegman films can be written into “Other investigations and dissenting theories” section on the Lee Oswald article as recent events such as “in March 2025, Luna alleged, during a congressional hearing for the further release of documents related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, that efforts were underway to release a film taken by Dave Wiegman Jr. of NBC capturing the unidentified "prayer man" filmed during the assassination, theorized by some to have been Lee Harvey Oswald.[1]77.99.93.28 (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC) 77.99.93.28 (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Jones, Kipp (March 29, 2025). "House Republican Claims NBC News Is Covering for JFK's Real Killer: Oswald 'Couldn't Have Been the Shooter'". Mediaite. Retrieved March 29, 2025.
Well, you don't need me to do that for you, I'm not special. Suggest it on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald see if it gets consensus or not. It might, or it might not. It might be more appropriately covered at Luna's bio, for example. After reading the source you cited, I'm not sure I actually know anything more about Oswald, but I certainly learned things about Luna for example. Feoffer (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to El Grande Americano, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Consensus would be needed first. Lemonademan22 (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Feoffer, I have reverted some of your edits and wanted to explain myself. There are a lot of good edits here that you have made, so don't take my reverts of some things the wrong way. This topic is an incredibly difficult topic, fraught with all kinds of good and bad research and two centuries of obfuscation. It is important that for this topic in particular, that everything in it is backed up by high quality secondary sources. I think Dan Vogel does some great stuff, and I hope he publishes his work in a book, but he hasn't done so yet. You can find some things in his biography of Joseph Smith: Making of a Prophet though, and I highly recommend looking there. Epachamo (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie kirk was assassinated... change the name!

[edit]

Charlie kirk was assassinated... change the name! 2600:4040:720A:E200:93A:47BE:425A:2AD3 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're preaching to the choir. Kirk was assassinated. I've argued that the name should be changed precisely as you suggest. Wikipedia move discussions take 7 days before an admin closes them, so it will be a few more days. In the mean time, remember that the text of the article uses the term assassination a lot and at the very top of the article. Feoffer (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Smith

[edit]

Hello Feoffer, I saw your FAC notes at Talk:Joseph Smith, where you've been updating the article. I'm not knowledgeable enough to help out with drafting, but once you get far enough along in the process to seek input at Wikipedia:Peer review, I wanted to extend an invitation to {{ping}} me. Sometimes it is hard to find reviewers there, although it does seem like there are many active Mormon editors so perhaps you will have good luck regardless. Rjjiii (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will do! :) Feoffer (talk) 20:24, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]